|

 
|
| | Name : | Scott Hunsaker | Organization : | Hart Intercivic | Post Date : | 9/30/2005 |
| Section : | 1.6.1 | Page no. : | 1-9 | Line no.: | 10-11 | Comment : | Comment:
This sentence suggests that it would be feasible to certify an "individual system component or element". Is this accurate?
Recommended change:
If this is the intent of the statement, then no change is recommended. If it is the intent of the Guidelines to require that a full, integrated (end-to-end) voting system be certified (i.e., ALL integrated components of the system) then a change is recommended to revise the language accordingly.
Rationale:
Present interpretation is that only a fully integrated system can be certified. See lines 23-25 on the same page. | |
|
|