|

 
|
| | Name : | Ian S. Piper | Organization : | Diebold Election Systems, Inc. | Post Date : | 9/29/2005 |
| Section : | 2.2.5.2.3 | Page no. : | 2-8 | Line no.: | | Comment : | For the requirement "The system shall provide a capability for a jurisdiction to designate critical status messages", allowing jurisdictions to designate, in the system, the criticality of the status messages is not a good idea. Interpretation of a status message in the audit log will be difficult if the set of messages are not standardized throughout installations of the voting system.
Proposed change: Remove the following language from this requirement, "The system shall provide a capability for a jurisdiction to designate critical status messages." | |
|
|