|

 
|
| | Name : | Scott Hunsaker | Organization : | Hart Intercivic | Post Date : | 9/30/2005 |
| Section : | A1D | Page no. : | D-7 | Line no.: | 4 | Comment : | 86
Vol. I App. D
Comment:
Bad assumption -- optical
scanning processes are
notoriously inaccurate, that's
why jurisdiction created the 1%
re-count. If this is referring to
"digital imaging", the distinction
must be made clear.
| |
|
|