US Election Assistance Commission - Voluntary Voting System Guidelines Vote
EAC Home
Introduction
View Guidelines
View Comments
Glossary

View Comments

Section CommentsGeneral CommentsGlossary Comments
 
Name :   Rachel Garner
Organization :   N/A
Post Date :   9/30/2005

General Comments
Comment :  (Quoted by Rachel Garner, who submitted this comment.)

[More on admission]  

WATCH THIS COMPANY

They actually WANT us to use a voter-verified paper trail!

Avante produced the first voter-verifiable touch-screen voting machine, called Vote-Trakker. Harris interviewed Kevin Chung, Avante's founder, and though she's not
finished yet * she is putting this company through the same investigative  
process she used with ES&S, Diebold, and Sequoia * Harris noticed something different.  

This company actually seems to welcome disclosure.  

Voting machines can be a good thing, IF the right safeguards are in place.  
But most voting machine companies (and many state officials) fight paper trails and hand audits tooth and nail. It's refreshing to see a company with enthusiasm about safeguards. (Paper
trail? Hand-count audits to verify accuracy? Full disclosure of known  
errors and key people?) All for it, says Chung.  

What's the catch? State officials get so enthused they sometimes stand up  
and applaud after Avante's Vote-Trakker demonstrations, but when lobbyists step in, all the checks get
written to companies with no paper trail, secret owners, and obstructive  
behavior. Stay tuned.

SENATE ETHICS DIRECTOR RESIGNS

Special coverage by The Hill  

On May 23, 1997, Victor Baird, who resigned Monday as director of the  
Senate Ethics Committee, sent a letter to Sen. Charles Hagel requesting "additional, clarifying
information" for the personal financial disclosure report that all  
lawmakers are required to file annually.

Among other matters, Baird asked the Nebraska Republican to identify and  
estimate the value of the assets of the McCarthy Group Inc., a private merchant banking company based in Omaha, with which Hagel had a special relationship.

[Full story by Alexander Bolton]

@ @ @

Unequal Protection:  
The rise of corporate dominance  
and theft of human rights
a new book by Thom Hartmann


click on the book to order  
In Unequal Protection, author Thom Hartmann tells a compelling,  
can't-put-it-down story
that tracks the history of the modern corporation back to the founding of  
the East India Company in 1600, through the Boston Tea Party revolt against transnational  
corporate domination of the early American economy, the rise of corporations during the Civil War,
the ultimate theft of human rights before the Supreme Court in 1886, and  
into the modern-day theft of human rights in the US and worldwide by corporate interests and the
politicians they own.
 
Because of a mistaken interpretation of a Supreme Court reporter's notes  
in an 1886 railroad tax case, corporations are now legally considered "persons," equal to humans and entitled to many of the same protections guaranteed only to humans by the Bill of Rights - a clear contradiction of the intent of the Founders of the United States.  
The results of this
"corporate personhood" have been:  

Unequal taxes  
Unequal privacy  
Unequal wealth  
Unequal trade  
Unequal media  
Unequal regulation  
Unequal responsibility for crime  
Unequal protection from risk  
Unequal citizenship and access to the commons  
To remedy the legal blunder of corporate personhood, Hartmann offers  
specific action
steps that can be taken by citizens, courts, legislatures, and local  
communities.