Overview
Contaminants
Federal
UST Legislation
State Support
Cleanup Status
UST Definitions
Colorado
Oil Inspect Sec
UST Data
Boulder
LUST Map
LUST
Anatomy
Corrosion
Leaks
Site Character
Remediation
Source
Groundwater
New Tanks
Installation
Monitoring
|
Federal LUST Regulations
Initial Response to LUST
Problems. In
the early 1980s, the states and EPA estimated that many of the several
million underground storage tanks (USTs) in the United States that
contained petroleum or hazardous chemicals were leaking. Many more tanks
were approaching the end of their useful life expectancy and were expected
to leak in the near future. States continue to report that leaking USTs (LUSTs)
are the leading source of groundwater contamination, and that petroleum
products are the most prevalent contaminants.
To address this nationwide problem of LUSTs, Congress established a leak prevention and
detection program through the 1984 amendments to the Solid Waste Disposal
Act, often referred to as the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
The act directed EPA to set operating requirements and technical standards
for tank design and installation, leak detection, spill and overfill
control, corrective action, and tank closure (RCRA, Subtitle I). Since
1988, regulations have been phased in. The last of these regulations
(which requires that all tanks be upgraded, replaced, or closed) entered
into effect on December 22, 1998. The current codes for regulation of
USTs
are found in 40
Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 280 and 281.
LUST Trust Fund. In 1986, Congress
created a response program for cleaning up releases from leaking petroleum
USTs through the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) which
amended RCRA Subtitle I. These provisions authorized the EPA to respond to
petroleum spills and leaks, and created the LUST Trust Fund for the cleanup of leaks from petroleum USTs in
cases where the UST owner or operator does not clean up a site. The LUST
Trust Fund money is used primarily by the EPA and states that have entered
into cooperative agreements with the EPA to oversee and enforce corrective
actions performed by responsible parties. The EPA and states also use Trust
Fund monies to
- conduct corrective actions where no responsible party has
been identified,
- conduct corrective actions where a responsible party fails to comply with a cleanup
order, and
- take cost recovery actions
against parties in the event of an emergency.
Since 1987, the money in the LUST Trust Fund has
been derived primarily from a $0.001-per-gallon motor fuels tax which
commenced in 1987. The tax generated approximately $150 million per year
and more than $1.6 billion before the taxing authority expired in December
1995. Congress reinstated the LUST tax in the Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997
for the period October 1, 1997, through March 31, 2005. As of December 31,
1998, the Trust Fund balance was $1.25 billion.
Details about current legislative and funding issues
are available in this report
by the Congressional Research Service, from which much of this section
was borrowed.
Support of State LUST
Programs. One of
the provisions of RCRA Subtitle I is the establishment of state UST
oversight programs and funds to assist UST owners in upgrading existing
tanks and remediating LUST sites. States were deemed to be in a
better position to deal with the specific issues of UST management and
LUST cleanup. Following approval of state programs by the EPA,
states are responsible for UST and LUST management.
Fifty states have entered into cooperative
agreements with EPA and receive grants under these agreements to help
cover the cost of administering the LUST program. States generally use the
LUST program grants to hire staff for technical oversight of corrective
actions performed by responsible parties, and also for undertaking
emergency responses and cleaning up abandoned tank sites. These
grants have totaled about 38% (approximately $788 million) of the total
amount available from the LUST Trust Fund. For
each of FY1997 and FY1998, the Administration requested $71.2 million for
the program, and Congress provided $60 million and $65 million,
respectively. For FY1999, EPA again requested $71.2 million, while
Congress approved $72.5 million. Some organizations, like the American
Water Works Association, have voiced opinions that this pace of
funding is not adequate to keep up with the LUST problem.
Forty-seven states, including Colorado, have
established state LUST trust funds, or financial assurance funds, which usually satisfy the financial
responsibility requirements for tank owners and operators with UST
upgrading and LUST remediation problems. Unlike the federal LUST Trust
Fund, many state funds may be used to reimburse financially solvent
businesses for some or all of the costs of remediating leaking UST sites.
Reimbursements often have benefited small businesses that faced financial
hardship when paying cleanup costs. Revenues for
these funds are typically generated through gas taxes and tank fees. For
1997, the total balance for state funds reached approximately $1.34
billion, annual revenues were $1.31 billion, and outstanding claims
against the funds reached $2.31 billion.
EPA also uses a portion of the LUST Trust Fund
appropriation to oversee cooperative agreements with states, to develop
program policies and guidance, to provide training, and to implement LUST corrective action programs on Indian lands.
Currently, EPA priorities in the LUST program include
- implementing Risk-Based Corrective Action (RBCA)
to reduce the backlog of confirmed releases and to help states use
their resources more efficiently
- providing assistance to Indian Tribes
- evaluating the risks and identifying cleanup
techniques for methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)
- promoting alternative site investigation and
remediation technologies
- supporting state programs with targeted training
and technical assistance.
Continued on the next page...
|
|

The EPA's Underground Storage Tank web
site

The EPA provides a comprehensive catalog of its materials
on USTs -- publications, videos, and a guide to internet availability
of these materials.
|